Partner Blogs

Don’t be a prig in peer review

From Nature Careers

Reading Time: < 1 minute

Thanks to Scott Graham for sharing their work on Unsplash.

I very much enjoy being a peer reviewer. Reviewing manuscripts allows me to stay up to date on the most-current research in my field, and I feel a sense of accomplishment when helping authors to effectively disseminate their science.

However, I have been discouraged by some comments from fellow reviewers that I’ve seen relayed to authors. Multiple reviews, which were shared with all reviewers, were rife with unnecessary, personal comments that merely served as subjective criticisms of the authors’ competencies, rather than as constructive assessment of the research. One comment went as far as implying that the authors themselves were illogical and unintelligent.

The process of peer review is meant to be highly critical. Many researchers, however, don’t receive proper training on being effective peer reviewers (I didn’t). We know that we should be critical as reviewers, but we are rarely taught to be kind and courteous. I think that, all too often, this focus on criticism rather than compassion is interpreted as a licence to be mean.


Read the rest of this article here on the Nature Careers website – Don’t be a prig in peer review

Leave a Reply

Enjoy listening to our podcasts?

We need your help – please vote for Dementia Researcher in the People’s Choice Podcast Awards.

  1. Click the link below
  2. Register
  3. Find us in the Science & Medicine Category
  4. Hit submit

Cast your vote here
I already voted – close this box

Translate »