Several people who spoke to Nature said that the reporting process for sexual harassment at Swedish universities also contributes to the low disclosure rates. “People don’t trust the process,” says Christina Björklund, a workplace researcher at the Karolinska Institute in Stockholm who was one of the authors of the Swedish higher-education study. Formal reporting sets in motion an “enormous mechanism” that can take a heavy mental toll and is a far cry from what those who have experienced sexual harassment say they need the most, which is “that somebody listens”, she says.

Across the Atlantic, Bedera has reached the same conclusion. For reporting rates to increase, systems need to be designed to help survivors, rather than burden them, she says. “Most victims of sexual harassment — regardless of national context — worry that they will be punished if too many people find out what happened to them. And that’s a fear that is grounded in reality,” she says.

Jimmie Kristensson, pro vice-chancellor for integrity and character at Lund University, told Nature that the university has been working to prevent sexual harassment and ensure good support and professional procedures for those who are affected by it since 2020. That’s when it received results from the university’s ‘Tellus’ study, which gathered information on sexual harassment at the institution starting in 2018, in the wake of the #metoo movement. Data from the Tellus study underpins both the latest paper1 and the authors’ 2022 study3.

“The work focuses on making the issues visible, increasing awareness among staff and students, improving support and ensuring quality processes for reporting, investigating and taking action,” says Kristensson.